Files like "ARMD-972.mp4" also prompt ethical concerns about provenance and consent. Digital video is easily duplicated, altered, and circulated without the subjects’ awareness. Anonymized or technical filenames can facilitate distribution by obscuring origin, complicating accountability. The uploader may intend privacy protection—or concealment. For historians, journalists, and archivists, the challenge is to balance access to visual records with respect for those depicted, especially when footage is potentially sensitive. Thus, interrogating a filename entails asking: who labeled this file, for what purpose, and under what conditions was it recorded? These questions are essential in an era when visual evidence carries potent persuasive power.